[C38] PHRF Rating

[rswensson at cox.net]

After N2E I had the same thoughts.  Perhaps we could petition NOSA to reconsider our rating.  It clearly was assigned in a prior era of technology and in order for us to dompete fairly we need a better number.  Did someone say 129.0? That would be great.  

Rick Swensson "Rascal"
---- Steven Ribble <steve.ribble at gmail.com> wrote: 
> Hey!!!...keep those numbers to yourselves...PHRF-NE has us/me at 129! ;-)
> On May 9, 2013 2:50 AM, "Larry Malmberg" <larrypi at roadrunner.com> wrote:
> 
> > Yes that is a good question, we replaced our rudder with a Cal 40 Rudder
> > and PHRF dinged me 3 seconds a mile, went from 114 to 111.****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Larry Malmberg****
> >
> > 7231 Boulder Avenue #507****
> >
> > Highland, CA 92346****
> >
> > Telephone:  909-208-1847****
> >
> > Fascimiline: 909-991-7568****
> >
> > E Mail:  larrypi at roadrunner.com****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely
> > in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside,
> > thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming; "WOW-- What a
> > Ride!"****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > *From:* listserve-bounces at catalina38.org [mailto:
> > listserve-bounces at catalina38.org] *On Behalf Of *Andrew T. Jessup
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 08, 2013 6:42 PM
> > *To:* 'Catalina 38 Listserve'
> > *Subject:* Re: [C38] high resolution logo****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Hi C-38s,****
> >
> > Anyone have an issue with our PHRF rating of 114?****
> >
> > It seems that a Cal 40 with same rating is typically****
> >
> > Faster.****
> >
> > Andy****
> >
> > CORVUS #250****
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Listserve mailing list
> > Listserve at catalina38.org
> > http://catalina38.org/mailman/listinfo/listserve_catalina38.org
> >
> >