[C38] Stanchions

D McC cat38skip at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 26 19:14:25 EST 2011


The inward 'custom bend' of the stanchions on our boats was caused, most likely, 
by spinnaker sheets and guys having to make the rather extreme angle back to the 
turning blocks at the stern. If a reaching strut were not being used then the 
lines hit the stanchions and voile', they attained that jaunty rake that we are 
all so familiar with ... 

I have had 2 welded as emergency repairs over the years .. and both are still 
sporting their scars. Maybe it's time to visit the folks in Upland again. I 
dropped in there a few years ago, while visiting relatives in the area, and was 
treated to great tour of the facility ... 


 <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>


Common Sense is a rare gift from the Gods.
Most people have only technical training!


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>


The gods do not deduct from man's allotted span those hours spent in sailing.


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>


When in doubt, try the vice You haven't tried before!


>
>From: Steven Ribble <steve.ribble at gmail.com>
>To: Catalina 38 Listserve <listserve at catalina38.org>
>Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 8:57:12 AM
>Subject: Re: [C38] Stanchions
>
>Glad you brought this up, Chuck (do you get that a lot....up-chuck? ;) ). When I 
>ordered mine I told Mark at Garhauer which stanchion it was (furthest aft on 
>each side) because I remembered a past post about the varying angles of our 
>stanchions from fore to aft.  His response was that their stanchions (and 
>supposedly the correct replacement part) were a right angle - 90 degrees.
>
>
>Mine were bent in (and cracked at the bale - everyone should take a look at this 
>on their own boats) a couple inches and I had always assumed it was to continue 
>the curve of the hull but I gotta say...it's really nice having them straight up 
>rather than in the path of your way forward.
>
>
>Steve
>
>
>On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Chuck Finn <charles at finn.ws> wrote:
>
>One way I know it is sailing season is the scrape on my shin     obtained as I 
>climb from the cabin to the cockpit.  The other wound     is the bruises on the 
>side of both legs as I bang into the     stanchions.  I love the look of our 
>boats, but the design idea that     the stanchions should follow the inward bend 
>of the tumblehome     really does not work for me.  There just is not enough 
>deck for a     guy my size.  I am still considering bending and re-welding the     
>current stanchions into a vertical position, but perhaps even a     better 
>solution would be to remove the current stanchions altogether     and going with 
>a toe rail stanchion like you see on C&C yachts.  Rigrite.com has these.   
>Attaching stanchions directly to our     toerail seems to be a viable option as 
>the rail is really heavy     duty.  Additionally, you can buy the bases and use 
>the current     tubing assuming it is not the light weight stuff Tom has 
>commented     on.   This would give us a lot more deck space for size 11 feet.
>>Just thinking aloud at this point, but I really am tired of the     bruising!
>>
>>Chuck Finn
>>Mighty Quinn #114
>>Great Lakes
>>
>> 
>>On 1/25/2011 3:25 PM, Max Soto wrote: 
>>Good to know that they share the same foot print... If       the removable 
>>stanchion's base also fits, I'll go for that one       next time..... A little 
>>heavier, but if they bend, it will be so       much easier to replace....... 
>>
>>>Thanks, Max
>>>
>>>
>>>2011/1/25 Steven Ribble <steve.ribble at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>Max, yes...same foot print.  Garhauer has a square-ish base             that I 
>>>think are for removable stanchions and a one             that's trapezoidal for 
>>>the solid/fixed type, which is what             mine are (also characterized by 
>>>the "flat top").  I can't             speak to the quality comment that Tom 
>>>refers to, I just know             mine have been on the boat for 30 years and 
>>>only needed to             be replaced because the over-wintering force exerted 
>>>by the             shrinkwrap caused them to bend.  I thought I saw             
>>>reinforced/gate style stanchions on their website, but don't             know 
>>>about the footprint. 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:13                     PM, Tom T. 
>>>><tdtron at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>>After hurricane Dennis (the Menace)                             skirted Tampa 
>>>>>Bay a few years ago with a                             near miss, we got tangled 
>>>>>up with a piling                             with the surge and had our 
>>>>>starboard                             lifelines damaged along with the 
>>>>>stanchions                             on that side.
>>>>> 
>>>>>I replaced the stanchions near the rail                             at the aft 
>>>>>end of the cabin with Catalina                             Direct stanchions. I 
>>>>>replaced both sides so                             they would match.  My boat 
>>>>>had standard                             stanchions and those stanchions should 
>>>>>have                             been the reinforced gate entry types which                             
>>>>>are heavier and more expensive.
>>>>> 
>>>>>I didn't shop Garhauer and I probably                             should have 
>>>>>but the original stanchions were                             JUNK so anything 
>>>>>was an upgrade!  The metal                             in the replacement 
>>>>>stanchions was much                             heavier gage and with the 
>>>>>reinforced foot                             design of the gate type stanchion 
>>>>>there was                             no comparison between quality or strength 
>>>>>of                             the two types.
>>>>> 
>>>>>The reason I bring this up is some of our                             members 
>>>>>may have stanchions like the ones I                             replaced which 
>>>>>may be a disaster waiting to                             happen.  If the 
>>>>>stanchions at the front of                             the gate are like the 
>>>>>thin, weak ones like I                             had they could fail.  The 
>>>>>thin tube original                             stanchions may be OK for middle 
>>>>>of the                             lifeline mounts but where the gates                             
>>>>>terminate they are inadequate
>>>>> 
>>>>>Tom Troncalli
>>>>> 
>>>>>-----                                 Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>From: Max Soto 
>>>>>>To: Catalina 38 Listserve
>>>>>>Sent: 1/25/2011 12:00:20 PM 
>>>>>>Subject: Re: [C38] Stanchions
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Steve, do they have the same                                   
footprint???
>>>>>>Regards, max
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sent from my iPod
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Jan 25, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Steven                                   Ribble 
>>>>>><steve.ribble at gmail.com>                                   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Our stanchions are Garhauer...I                                     replaced a 
>>>>>>couple last                                     season...about $50 each.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, Jan                                       24, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Max Soto 
>>>>>>><maxsoto at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hey Steve, 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I'm not surprised if they                                           were made by 
>>>>>>>>Garhauer...... 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Max
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>2011/1/24                                               Steve Smolinske 
>>>>>>>><SSmolinske at rainierrubber.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Does                                                           anyone know                                                           
>>>>>>>>who made our                                                           
>>>>>>>>stanchions?  
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>Steve                                                           
>Smolinske
>>>>>>>>>President 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>425-227-4500
>>>>>>>>>www.RainierRubber.com
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>The                                                           information                                                           
>>>>>>>>>contained in                                                           this 
>>>>>>>>>email may                                                           be                                                           
>>>>>>>>>confidential                                                           and/or                                                           
>>>>>>>>>proprietary in                                                           nature 
>>>>>>>>>and is                                                           intended for                                                           
>>>>>>>>>the recipient                                                           of the 
>>>>>>>>>email                                                           only.  Please                                                           
>>>>>>>>>treat all                                                           information                                                           
>>>>>>>>>contained in                                                           this 
>>>>>>>>>and any                                                           communication                                                           
>>>>>>>>>with the 4M                                                           Company as                                                           
>>>>>>>>>such.  Thank                                                           you.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>PBefore                                                           printing,                                                           
>>>>>>>>>think about                                                           
>>>>>>>>>ENVIRONMENTAL                                                           
>>>>>>>>>responsibility
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>Listserve mailing list
>>>>>>>>>Listserve at catalina38.org
>>>>>>>>>http://catalina38.org/mailman/listinfo/listserve_catalina38.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>-- 
>>>>>>>>Max Soto
>>>>>>>>C38 #198 ESTANCIA
>>>>>>>>Puntarenas, Costa Rica
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>Listserve mailing list
>>>>>>>>Listserve at catalina38.org
>>>>>>>>http://catalina38.org/mailman/listinfo/listserve_catalina38.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-- 
>>>>>>>Steve Ribble
>>>>>>>207/852-0971
>>>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>Listserve mailing list
>>>>>>Listserve at catalina38.org
>>>>>>http://catalina38.org/mailman/listinfo/listserve_catalina38.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>Listserve mailing list
>>>>>Listserve at catalina38.org
>>>>>http://catalina38.org/mailman/listinfo/listserve_catalina38.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-- 
>>>>Steve Ribble
>>>>207/852-0971
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Listserve mailing list
>>>>Listserve at catalina38.org
>>>>http://catalina38.org/mailman/listinfo/listserve_catalina38.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>Max Soto
>>>C38 #198 ESTANCIA
>>>Puntarenas, Costa Rica
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ Listserve mailing list 
>>>Listserve at catalina38.org 
>>>http://catalina38.org/mailman/listinfo/listserve_catalina38.org 
>>>
>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Listserve mailing list
>>Listserve at catalina38.org
>>http://catalina38.org/mailman/listinfo/listserve_catalina38.org
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Steve Ribble
>207/852-0971
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://catalina38.org/pipermail/listserve_catalina38.org/attachments/20110126/7b5a6ffe/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Listserve mailing list